fluoride alert iq

The molecular structure of Sarin: It is worthy to note that over 81.5% of the samples of tap water were above 1.5 mg/l (NOM-127- SSA1-1994) with the highest value of 12.5 mg/. Combined Raven’s Test for RuralChina (CRT-RC), “[C]hildren residing in areas with higher than normal water fluoride level demonstrated more impaired development of intelligence and moderate [dental fluorosis]. Age, gender, parent education level and family income had no significant association with IQ.”, “School children residing in area with higher than normal water fluoride level demonstrated more impaired development of intelligence when compared to school children residing in areas with normal and low water fluoride levels.”. In this study near to 60% of the children consumed contaminated water and the prevalence of children with IQ below 90 points was 25% in the control group (F urine 1.5 mg/g creatinine) in comparison with the 58% of children in the exposed group (F urine >5 mg/g creatinine) (OR = 4.1, CI 95% 1.3–13.2) (data unpublished). . 80 children total: 20 children from “mild” fluorosis area, 20 from “medium” fluorosis area, 20 from “severe” fluorosis area, and 20 from non-fluorosis area. Mental Work Capacity determined by number of letters found (NLF), rate of error (RE), index of mental capacity (IMC), short-term memory capacity (SMC), visual reaction time (RT). And that’s not the only part of the brain that suffers: over 30 independent studies have linked fluoride to a reduction in childhood IQ: A 2018 study published in Occupational & Environmental Medicine found that, for every increase of 1 milligram per liter of fluoride in a pregnant women’s urine, their offspring averaged 2.4 points lower IQ scores at age 1-3 years old. “Even though there were differences in the results from the 10 year-old subjects from the normal comparative group, in contrast to subjects from the high fluoride high arsenic group and the high fluoride group, these results might not be overtly representative as less number of subjects from the high fluoride group has been tested.”. (p=0.06). Singh VP, Chauhan DS, Tripathi S, Kumar S, Gaur V, Tiwari M, Tomar A. For the 4 to 8 year olds, the fluoride level their entire life (including during fetal development) was between 0.49 and 0.81 ppm. About half of the children are in the district where water fluoride concentrations were within the Standards for Drinking Water Quality in China of 1 mg/L, while the other half had significantly higher fluoride concentrations than the screening guideline of 1 mg/L. Rat Studies Link Brain Cell Damage With Aluminum and Fluoride in Water Nagarajappa R, Pujara P, Sharda AJ, Asawa K, Tak M, Aapaliya P, Bhanushali N. (2013). Children with moderate or severe dental fluorosis scored significantly lower in total and backward digit span tests than thosewith normal or questionable fluorosis. In addition, food products also contribute to the F intake as the people in these areas consume their own crops. The results showed no significant difference between fluorosis group and control group (P > 0.05). Urine fluoride had a stronger association with IQ in children with TT genotype. The differences could not be attributed to confounding educational, economic, social, cultural, and general demographic factors.”. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale test for Rural China (WATS-RC); Associated learning (AL) test; Digit Span (DS) test; Similarity test; Speech fluency test (SFT); Comprehension test. “A high fluoride intake was associated with a lower intelligence.”, 330 children (8 groups of 21-97 children categorized based on fluoride and iodine content of water), – High Fluoride/High Iodine = 3.9 mg/L – High Fluoride/Low Iodine = 2.0 mg/L – High Fluoride = 1.8 mg/L – Low Fluoride =  0.38-0.5 mg/L – Control Area = 0.8 mg/L. When will it be enough to convince policymakers to change course? We have found a significant inverse relationship between intelligence and the water fluoride level, and intelligence and the urinary fluoride level. This study also found that there were great differences in terms of the level of intelligence between children with Val/Val or Met/Val and children with Met/Met, and such differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05): children with the highly active COMT Val/Val genotype had significantly higher intelligence than those with the Met/Met COMT genotype or the Met/Val COMT genotype, and intelligence  in children with any of the three genotypes in the endemic fluorosis area was lower than that in the non-endemic fluorosis area, indicating that the highly active COMT Val/Val genotype has a protective effect on children’s intelligence development. . (1) The two areas have common habits and lifestyles in terms of cuisine, economy, culture, education, agricultural goods, etc.. (2) No chemical factories in area.