background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%);
It just felt a bit clearer, whereas in the final recording from the Rode notes overlapped more and it made the final mix a bit messy.
}
The p220 comes in a lovely looking metal carry case which is very light yet feels very sturdy. The way that Rode have tried to tailor this mic to sound great straight out the box is actually the reason some people aren’t massive fans of it. Hi friend and Welcome! This feature can obviously be a pro or a con depending on what you are using the microphone for (which I will come onto in later sections of this article). It shows how directional the particular mic is with 0° being directly in front and 180° being the rear. This makes the Rode quite a good option for vloggers and podcasters. Musician's HQ is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. It may pick up things that you don’t want, so be aware of your studio setup. table#t17 thead tr th#t17.end {
width: 50%;
AKG C214 is rather bulky to the sides, but also slightly lighter than Rode NT1A. That said, the AKG p220 is still an excellent microphone and it was actually my favourite of the two when it came to recording guitars. The bass notes were not drowning out the higher notes and everything balanced nicely in the recording. jQuery(document).ready(function($) { }
I actually really wasn’t a fan of the AKG p220 for vocals at all. Rode NT1A is a true condenser mic, externally biased, featuring a large 1" capsule with a gold-plated diaphragm. $('.ptp-price').matchHeight(false);
The table below is a quick summary of the specs of both these microphones side by side. Besides having multiple selectable polar patterns, the audio quality is also enhanced. So if you are buying your mic to primarily record acoustic guitars and other instruments then I would actually save yourself a bit of money and go for this option. Both models are condenser microphones. But for the majority of you out there, who I imagine aren’t professional sound engineers, the work Rode have done should be seen as a bonus and should really help you get a great sound without much effort. I suppose the main reason you are looking to buy a microphone is the sound right? A sound that personally I am always after when recording acoustic guitar. margin: 20px 0;
}
And once you factor in how affordable they are, these are well worth the money. Meanwhile, the bass-cut filter can attenuate sounds lower than 160 Hz, reducing low-frequency noise such as breath and wind sounds and mechanical vibrations. However, even taking that into account the Rode is still around $50 more expensive. If you are looking for a decent and reliable condenser microphone that does not break the bank, both AKG and Rode would like to offer you their popular condenser models, AKG C214 and Rode NT1A. We want to interview you. The frequency response graphs shown on the left show the sensitivity of the microphone over its full operating range. It is a solid mic that is great for voiceover. You could definitely take this case on the road without worrying about the microphone getting damaged. The AKG has a flatter frequency response and so may be better if you are a bit more experienced and want to make decisions on the EQ yourself a bit more. filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient( startColorstr="#660000", endColorstr="#8F0000",GradientType=0 );
$('.ptp-plan').matchHeight(false); table#t17 thead tr th.t17 {
background: -o-linear-gradient(top, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%);
I thought they both sounded pretty darn good. Many top producers still use these microphones and until you are at a really high level, when you can get this quality for around $200 it just isn’t worth spending $500 or more. However, if you think you don’t need the two special features, you can pick Rode NT1A instead. So I decided to buy both microphones and put them through a series of test over a series of months in the ultimate AKG p220 vs Rode nt1a showdown! On top of that, it doesn’t pick up too much background noise. There are plenty of reviews out there that look at the specs etc. One cool thing about Rode NT1A is that it boasts an extremely ultra-low self-noise level, which is barely 5 dB (A). So I should probably swiftly move onto that. The cable seems decent quality and from testing it the sound is great. background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%);
View Profile View Forum Posts View Articles Registered User Join Date Oct 2011 Posts 57 Thanks 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts . If you are planning to use the microphone for podcasting, vlogging or other spoken word applications there are a few thing you will be looking for. width: 50%;
A nice amount of low end without being boomy, which is a common issue when recording acoustic guitar with other types of microphone. Hi Narco, why would you consider that one better than the AKG Perception 220 or Rode NT1A? line-height: 1.2;
color: #EEEEEE;
Both are praised for the excellent audio reproduction quality, providing a degree of warmth and brightness, as well as delivering very good clarity.
border-width: 0px;
Check out the similarities and differences between the Rode NT1A vs. AKG C214 in this informative comparison review! background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #FFFFFF;
The shock mount feels nicer and better made than the AKG one and the fact the pop filter is already attached is a very nice feature that keeps everything neat in your studio.