I used a Røde NT2 for about ten years, mainly for vocals and acoustic guitar and was quite happy with it. It’s a dynamic mic, and does a phenomenal job of blocking out room noise. Sounds fantastic. Despite the severe damage to my credit card I am happy to have such a beautiful and clear sounding microphone to work with. Differences between the Rode NT1a and the NT2a. However, Rode K2 is available at a much lower price point. The NT2A has omni-directional, cardioid, and figure 8 patterns, while the NT2 only has cardioid and omni-directional. good work . The main difference was the high end smoothness of the U87 vs. the NT2. Rode NT2A vs Neumann TLM-103 Review Colbert • June 29, 2015 • No Comments • When shopping for a professional high quality microphone Neumann and Rode are two companies that come to mind in delivering a high quality product that will last for years. I like the NT2-A better than the NT2. In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. I’ve read a lot of reviews on the NT2A, and have seen it endorsed for all of the following: Being that this is a studio bundle, the only thing I would recommend is to purchase a good and durable mic stand. The mic was too sibilant before, but now is smooth sounds good on everything. When the low-cut filter is activated, the self noise of the microphone rises to an unacceptable level. I can honestly say that there is a slight difference. The NT2 looks a lot like the famous Neumann U87, while the NT2A is more of an original Rode design. On top of what costas14 said, if your room is far from acoustically decent, U87 will not work so well as it will pick up all of the imperfection of your room. The NT1a has a cardioid polar pattern, while the NT2a has three polar patterns (cardioid, figure eight, and omni-directional). IMHO, if you are just starting out, the only pattern you'll really need … I recorded on a tascam cassette 4 track in those days and the spitty sound of that mic was probably OK for the poor high frequency reproduction of that recorder. I think you were trying to compare the nt1 and nt1a but instead you just made up a microphone. I used a vocal chain of: Avalon-Shadowhills-192 I/O- Pro-tools. I also owned a u87ai at the time. I've done quite a few multi-microphone shoot-outs for … But there are ways to colour it up to hide your horrible singing talents. Expect to have this for a long time. His sense of humour, coupled with a knack for excellence and strict attention to detail are what allow him to stand out in an crowded industry. In the following article, we will discuss the comparisons between Rode K2 vs Neumann U87. I preferred the Rode both times. The NT2 looks a lot like the famous Neumann U87, while the NT2A is more of an original Rode design. Both mics really excel with instruments and vocals alike. Rode NT1A and Rode NT2A are both 'Anniversary' microphones released by Rode, some sort of special edition mics that are launched by the company to mark their anniversary. Warm sounding but also natural. It’s accurate, rich and balanced. The NT2 can sound thin and bright comparatively. But it may not, so it's important that you try before you buy. And that would be Neumann. A really versatile mic that is at it’s best with vocals. No, actually, you’re wrong. Despite being more affordable, its features do look more attractive. Just gotta switch the e and the u. Some have accused the NT2A of being a bit bright/harsh in the high end, which isn’t surprising considering this is common with Rode mics. That 3.6k microphone will really showcase how bad you are. I would have both in my studio if you can afford it. The Rhode NT2 was my first "quality" mic and sounded much better than the AKG c3000, which was my first condensor mic I owned. In his spare time, he likes to fish, paint, play guitar, pray, rap, make beats, take photos, record videos, graphic design, and more. Home Studio Guide – Part I (Introduction), The Best Audiophile Headphones [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part II) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part III) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The Best Audiophile Headphones (Part IV) [Complete Buyer’s Guide], The 5 Best Audiophile Headphones For Under $500, The Best Headphones for Gaming [In Depth Guide]. Like all condenser microphones, it’s very sensitive, and picks up a lot. The NT2 was a little shrill, BUT with minor high end tweeks( not even compressing), I was able to get a Supreme sound from the NT2. Rode NT2 vs Neumann U87? Both are ultra-quiet mics with very low self-noise levels. I recently bought one and I wasn't intending to use my vocals on it but I did a test run. By many accounts, this mic is actually better than the NT1A, but does cost more. Required fields are marked *, “As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.”, “Stu is determined to help you make sound decisions, and strives to deliver the best and most in depth content on the internet! As far as sound quality goes, both microphones sound almost identical. I have used and NT2 and U87 on several recordings. It’s also extremely dynamic and quiet, which is arguably it’s greatest strength. I had a U87 and borrowed the NT2 to try to achieve a "different" sound. You may find that the Rode NT1A (left) sounds as good as a Neumann U87 on your voice.