Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance. The graphics card supports multi-display technology. Newer versions can support more bandwidth and deliver better performance. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. The GTX 1650 Super pulls around 25-30W more compared to the GTX 1050 Ti in the worst-case scenario, that being the Furmark GPU stress test, while overall that’s around 130W instead of the 100-105W for the GTX 1050 Ti, which again goes to show why does the GTX 1650 Super deliver more performance. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X 6G - Tarjeta Gráfica Enthusiast, ASUS CERBERUS-GTX1050TI-O4G, Tarjeta Gráfica (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 4GB, GDDR5, 128 bit, 7680 x 4320 Pixeles, PCI Express 3.0, 1480 MHz), GeForce 9800 GTX+, 1480 MHz, ASUS GTX 1650-O4G-LP-BRK - Tarjeta gráfica (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, 4 GB, GDDR 5, 128 bit, 896 Cuda Núcleos, 1710 MHz, HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI, PCI Express 3.0 x 16), GeForce GTX 1650 Super Aero ITX OC - Tarjeta gráfica Performance, Msi Geforce GTX 1650 Aero ITX 4G OC Tarjeta Gráfica (4 GB, GDDR5, 128 bit, 7680 x 4320 Pixeles, Pci Express x 16 3.0), Negro/ Plata, ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 Super OC Edition 4GB GDDR6 - Tarjeta gráfica: alcanza Frecuencias de refresco Altas para Que arrases en los Juegos sin Tener Que esforzarte. 75W vs 100W; Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) ? Remember this number for later on when we take a look at the benchmarking results. ADD … Remember this number for later on when we take a look at the benchmarking results. But, this topic is not important, or to say it’s not what we came for, because as buyers of graphics cards, especially models that are in this budget segment, we always search for a value deal, the bottom line so to speak. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. So where does the new GTX 1650 Super get its added performance difference in comparison to the GTX 1050 Ti? Speaking of that power consumption, If we average in the FPS figures across all of those 10 games divide that number with the power consumption of the cards, you would get around 0,6 FPS per watt of power for the GTX 1650 Super, instead of the around 0,5 FPS per watt for GTX 1050 Ti, which makes the GTX 1650 Super a bit more efficient than it . With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Of course, there’s a reason why people are buying this GPU or other models like a bit new GT 1030, but if it’s not because you need a GPU this exact second to get your PC going for as cheap as possible, just to output a picture, it’s better that you just save a little bit of more money, in order to get something that will get you a better value. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. So in conclusion, it’s not that you will be getting more on a count of the architecture being super new and super effective, although the name suggests otherwise, but rather because of the fact that you’re getting a more equipped GPU configuration, that being the larger amount of CUDA cores, in combination with also higher stock core clock frequency of the GPU. The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth. Why is Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti better than MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Super Gaming? Taking a closer look at the results, the performance increase that the GTX 1650 Super brings in is in most of the cases well above 50% compared to the GTX 1050 Ti, actually it’s in between that and 80% mark, with an average of 70% performance increase across 10 games which I used here, not counting in the Heaven benchmarks, making the newer card the obvious winner in this GTX 1050 Ti vs GTX 1650 Super battle. Items linking to Amazon are a part of the Amazon Affiliate program in which I and my TekTick website participate. Well, putting them side by side, the GTX 1650 Super has 1280 CUDA Cores, while GTX 1050 Ti has 786, which is a difference of 512 CUDA cores, or roughly 67%. Although it’s been three years between their launches, the generation gap is particularly minimal, one basically came after the other, Turing after Pascal, and that’s if you don’t count the enterprise only oriented Volta series, so it’s hard to expect any major difference on a count of the change in the GPU’s unless its something really, really revolutionary in question. Although the video memory size stayed the same between them, 4 GB, as well as the width of the memory bus, 128-bit, this change in GDDR technology bumped up the memory bandwidth to 192 GB/s, so that’s a memory data rate of 12 Gbps compared to the 7 Gbps, which is a decent bump. No extra power required on many models. Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort. DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance. Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates. Again, before I show you the benchmarking results, if you have any question or other concerns about this card, feel free to leave your comment down below, and down there, in the description box to be precise, you can also find my setup which I used for testing this GPU out, but the core components are as power usual – Intel’s six-core Core i5 – 8600K CPU overclocked to 5,1 GHz and paired with 2 x 8GB of 3000 MHz DDR4 RAM. Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display. The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. I went a bit off track, but nevertheless, it’s good to have the whole backstory so to speak. Quiet design. The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. The graphics card uses a combination of water and air to reduce the temperature of the card. MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Super Gaming. This is why I love doing content like this, in the hope that it will reach new users and help them decided their next purchase. Just a quick side note, I’ve only used 1080p resolution for my testing this time, since the GTX 1050 Ti can’t cope with 1440p resolution in newer titles and at high graphics settings, being it because of the video memory size or lack of raw power, as even the GTX 1650 Super barely manages to get by, let alone it. TEST YOUR GPU. Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. This in a way confirms the theory about this generation not having any major performance increase when it comes to the efficiency of the architecture, compared to its predecessor, as basically for the most part percentage-wise it corespondents to that new GPU hardware configuration and the increase in number of components on it, those being the added CUDA cores, which is achieved thanks to lowering down the manufacturing process from 14 nm to 12 nm, and that’s exactly what we get, a bit below 70% more CUDA cores gets us around 70% performance gain in comparison to the GTX 1050 Ti, which is why I told you to remember that percentage number at the begging of the video, backed up with higher GPU clock and GDDR6 video memory, which gives it that edge in efficiency and a little bit of extra performance. That said, today we’re checking out who wins the GTX 1650 Super vs GTX 1050 Ti battle, aloguht the results are pretty much predictable. This generally results in better performance than a similar, single-GPU graphics card. Struggles in more demanding games. If you want to see how the GTX 1650 Super performs at 1440p, feel free to watch my review of it, I’ll put a link in the right top corner of this video. Albeit they aren’t making a lot of money on it since those are very low priced products, so the profit margins aren’t that good, but the point was that customers were not getting a product with a good price to performance ratio. Based on 12,009 user benchmarks for the Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile Max-Q) and the GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 651 GPUs. The GTX 1050 Ti was probably one of the most famous Nvidia’s entry-level GPUs in the last couple of years, which is why I deduced it to run against their current-gen entry-level model – the GTX 1650 Super. This way you're directly contributing to the website and help me to improve my content (with no additional cost for you), and for that - a sincere thank you from me! Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. Handles all games at Full HD. A higher transistor count generally indicates a newer, more powerful processor. The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Ridiculously low power consumption. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ventus XS 6g OC - Tarjeta gráfica Enthusiast.