brief resilience scale reliability and validity pdf

Descriptive results of the resilience measures, Figure 1 shows the standardized estimates of the confirmatory model and Table 1 the, unstandardized estimates and the standard errors. sample of parents of critically ill children was collected, and from the University). perceived severity) had any relation to the BRS score. El objetivo del estudio fue adaptar la escala Protective Factors of Resilience Scale al español y analizar sus propiedades psicométricas. 0000002946 00000 n S.E. <<4F72B0C26A4C5B43ACA70C29E76AFF51>]>> Furthermore, our analyses to test concurrent and convergent evidence of validity, similar constructs. This questionnaire constitutes a reliable and valid assessment of personal factors underlying resilience. 0000019263 00000 n Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 179-189. role of resilience, emotions, perceived severity of the child’s condition and stress in predicting PTG. 0000019740 00000 n 0000000016 00000 n Method: The Resilience Scale for Adults was first translated int o Turkish, and was then back translated. The English version, and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, Adequate convergent and discriminant evidence of the test’s scores, Sills & Stein, 2007; Connor & Davidson, 2003), score, the higher the resilience). Reliability and Validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish, Reliability and Validity of the Brief Resilience Scale’s (BRS) Spanish Version. It was completed along with CDRISC10 by 416 adults. The psychometric properties of its scores were examined in a heterogeneous sample of 620 Spanish adults. Depression and Anxiety 2003; 18: 71-82). There is no valid and reliable measure of resilience in Spanish which includes both internal protective and external factors. Results: However, it is worth emphasizing here that research concerning the predictive validity of the scale is scarce, ... Two external psychology experts assisted with adding the appropriate psychological tests for the study. This study addresses this issue by studying prevalence rates and factors related to a common response to prolonged stress such as burnout syndrome. terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. The analyses yielded good reliability indexes (?=.78 for the complete scale; from ?=.71 to .88 for the coping strategies subscales). 0000032311 00000 n general Spanish population or for Spanish individuals in health conditions. SARS, H1N1, MERS); (2) the specific socio-economic and political context of the C19PRC-UKW1; (3) the recruitment of a large sample of UK adults aged 18 years and older (n=2025) via an internet-based panel survey; (4) the representativeness of the C19PRC-UKW1 sample compared to the UK adult population in terms of important sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. SCSA = Situational Coping Scale for, Adults. 0000082796 00000 n Results Our contextual scale, therefore, can be used to measure resilience within different contexts and across different types of populations. Reference: Rodríguez-Rey, R., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Hernansaiz-Garrido, H. (2016). Method: The scale was translated and adapted into Spanish, then, two studies were carried out to examine its psychometric properties in two samples (healthy and chronic illness). This study aimed to adapt the Prince-Embury resiliency model, developed with children and adolescents, to adult populations. Parents of critically ill children had three assessments: T0 (the fi, Factor analysis of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). The PCL-5 (α = 0.96) was used to explore PTSD symptomatology (e.g., repeated, disturbing, and unwanted memories of the stressful experience) 50,51 . A global measure of perceived stress. The purpose of the current study was to ascertain the psychometric properties, Our study suggests that the Spanish version of the scale showed adequate psychometric, properties in terms of reliability, validity and sensitivity of its scores, Regarding reliability, it was found that the BRS scores demonstrated good internal, version (Smith et al., 2008). The results indicated that the burnout rates are high in this group, especially for the emotional exhaustion dimension. Our validation studies also provided important diagnoses regarding BRS "sensitivity", indicating that groups with higher stress levels achieved lower BRS resilience results. The BRS scores showed adequate reliability (α = .83; intraclass coefficient = .69). This exploratory longitudinal study was conducted in health care facilities and community support groups from PR. The psychometric properties of the, Spanish BRS scores were examined in a heterogeneous sample of 620 Spanish adults. In addition, training components were modified under isolation conditions at p < 0.001. We assessed resilience or the ability to bounce back (e.g., It does not take me long to recover from a stressful event) throughout the BRS (α = 0.83).